![]() |
You are viewing Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |
![]() | |
|
For most of my life, I've been the kind of person who only reads one book at a time. Trying to juggle two, or more, required a certain type of concentration (not to mention time) that I didn't have. This year, though, I have been working on cultivating this skill, and I think I'm getting pretty good at it, if I may say so myself. I also am beginning to understand the appal of having a couple of books going at once, because sometimes you find all kinds of weird synergy. For example, right now I am reading two books about love: one is The Principles of Love, by Emily Franklin, and the other is The History of Love, by Nicole Krauss. The first is YA, the other adult lit, and they could not be any more different. But they're both really good, and moving between them, I'm finding, is kind of like cleansing the palate. Every time I switch back to one from the other, it's like everything unique and cool about the narrator and story jumps out at me all over again. It makes me wonder why I haven't done this before. Speaking of books, and reading, did anyone else see the piece Naomi Wolfe wrote in the NYT Book Review this weekend about teen lit, and the Gossip Girls/A-List books in particular? (I'd link to it, but I think you have to be registered.) Very interesting, I have to say. I haven't read a lot of the GG books--maybe two?--but I can certainly see the appeal. It's the same thing that makes you (or, um, me) love things like Laguna Beach and the O.C. Maybe they're not High Literature, and the characters not exactly who you'd want to emulate, but I don't necessarily think everyone reads books for those reasons, every time. Sometimes, you just want to escape into a big campy story, even if you know your own life will never be anything approximating what's on the page. I think what's great about YA these days is that there ARE so many different types of books to choose from. You can read around and find something for every taste, and that's not necessarily true in all genres. Anyway, just my two cents. I know I am FAR from an expert, and there are probably many places online you can find qualified people discussing the article and what it all means. As my husband would say, I' m not a bookologist. And, with that last sentence, I think I probably lost any respect I'd gained by writing a totally book-themed post. Darn! So close! Oh, well.... |
|
Previous Entry · Leave a comment · Add to Memories · Tell a Friend · Next Entry | |
On March 14th, 2006 03:18 pm (UTC), (Anonymous) commented: NYT article I did see that article, and as a fan of all different types of teen lit, from your books to the Gossip Girl series, i was a little upset. Yes, there are themes of sexuality at times in a lot of teen books, but do people really think that their kids haven't heard about it already? Come on. I totally agree with you that the appeal of teen books is that there are so many different types, and I highly doubt most people read the Gossip Girl books and want to be just like Blair and Serena. Anyway. ttyl! ~@lison |
On March 14th, 2006 04:55 pm (UTC), (Anonymous) commented: multi-reader I am an avid multi-reader! I am not content unless I have an entire stack of books to choose from piled up in a basket near my bed. Currently, my basket holds: Rebel Angels (Libba Bray), Bird by Bird (Anna Lammott), The Truth About Forever (guess who?), Running With Scissors (Augusten Burroughs), Middlesex (Jeffrey Eugenides), Gilead (Marilynne Robinson), The First Five Pages (Noah Lukeman) and The Tenth Circle (Jodi Picuoult- esp. loving this one). Sometimes my best friend teases me that this is a form of OCD because if I see a book that looks interesting, I have to have it then, otherwise I might forget about it! But it's such a fun, comforting compulsion! What bookworm doesn't love a towering stack of intriguing books? GirlGrownUp, Still Dreaming www.girlgrownup.blogspot.com On March 15th, 2006 03:33 am (UTC), (Anonymous) replied: Re: multi-reader I was completely drawn in to My Sister's Keeper. girlgrownup, still dreaming |
On March 14th, 2006 05:30 pm (UTC), (Anonymous) commented: I never understood why people couldn't read more than one book at a time. I usually read three together. People are like, "No, I can't do that, I get the plots mixed up" and I just wonder how. I mean, every book is so different, I don't think I could ever get the plots/characters mixed up. But maybe that's just me! The History of Love... I bought a signed version of that about 2 months ago at a Half-Priced Books store and I haven't quite gotten around to reading it, though it's on the upper end of my "list". I love when you recommend good books because I usually end up agreeing with you when I read them. For example, The Girl's Guide to Hunting and Fishing... I loved it, absolutely. - Melissa http://www.myspace.com/happy_girl |
On March 14th, 2006 08:33 pm (UTC), (Anonymous) commented: Completely random! Okay, so I was sitting here reading Sarah's journal and having lunch - I work at an art gallery in NYC - when I heard a familiar voice from out in the gallery space. I went out there to see, and holy f--k - KEANU was standing right there! I swear! Usually I'm pretty chill when I see celebrities, but this was a whole other level. I was dumbstruck. He's even more gorgeous in person! |
On March 14th, 2006 09:33 pm (UTC), (Anonymous) commented: Sarah, did you see that the list that went along with the article (YA books not about sex and drugs) had Someone Like You listed on it? -M |
On March 14th, 2006 10:37 pm (UTC), (Anonymous) commented: But.... After much searching, I found that article you were talking about. Interesting, I must say. I have to completely disagree and agree with her points. I mean, sure. I see what she was saying about it being too much sex and shopping and shallow, irresponsible hehavior, BUT it's just a book. Like it's just a television show or a movie, this is just a fun book. My main point is: at least the girls that are reading these books are literate! I mean, they could be doing something else like video games or something (not that those are all bad either), but no. They are choosing to read... even if it is just for enjoyment. Adults harp all the time that "kids don't read enough these days!" Well, when there is actually something out there that we like to read, they want to hapr on that, too. Not every wants to read a classic or a Jodi Picoult novel about current issues (even though I love them). Sure, there are more middle of the road novels that are amazing, too: your books, Meg Cabot, Ann Brashares! But really... just be happy we are reading anything! P.s. Did you read the recommended girls' reading list? Someone Like You was on there! You got a Seal of Approval, Sarah! |
On March 15th, 2006 12:54 am (UTC), (Anonymous) commented: Hello..this is Bri. First time to visit your site and I must say its very nice ^^ I've just recently started this year reading a couple or so books at a time. Right now I'm reading your book Someone Like You and Steven King's Four Past Midnight. Two totally differnent genres I know, but its going well. But if I read two books that are similar in some way or another then I get a little confused...especially if I'm not really "in" to one of the books. And YAY! for you loving things like Laguna Beach. Sometimes, you just want to escape into a big campy story, even if you know your own life will never be anything approximating what's on the page.That is very true...I think everyone thinks that at one point or another. Anywho, like I said, this is my first time visiting your site so I thought I would leave you a peaceful comment. Glad everything's going well for you! |
On March 15th, 2006 02:15 am (UTC), (Anonymous) commented: I read Naomi Wolfe's article as well as the list of her recommended YA books (I actually scanned it for books by you, because in my opinion--you are the best :D) Anyway, I agreed with her about the Gossip Girl series. I've read one (maybe two--but they all seem the same to me) Gossip Girl book and one A-List book, and they just seemed dumb to me. I read People to get my celebrity/rich heiress fix, and I read your books for my delightful YA fix. I just thought the books were boring. The point she made about the authors behind the A-List series being hired was interesting too. My problem with her article and list was that she seemed to be telling parents what their daughters should read--and since the Gossip Girls have careless, meaningless sex and no plot they are bad influences on girls. I like to think we teenage girls have minds of our own, and can just say no to pathetic literature in general. On the same note, I don't like your books because they show teenagers dealing with issues and then coming to the proper moral decision--I like them because they are much more complex than "Ben slept with Blair, OMG!1!!!1!111" So, actually, I don't agree with you or Naomi Wolfe. But I still really love your books and your blog :D P.S. why I didn't really agree with you: who wants their life to be like those girls in Gossip Girl? I would like my life to be like a lot of the characters in your books--they may not be perfect, at times they may suck, but eventually they come to terms with their lives and their grief and their problems...and things generally work out. In real life, closure to grief never really comes, all the ends don't get neatly tied together, and sometimes things don't get fixed. So, I'd say (for me at least) your books are the lovely escape, and definitely one waaay more interesting than a book written by a media company, so that they can advertise their junk. |
On March 15th, 2006 03:32 am (UTC), (Anonymous) commented: reading multiple books I too like to read a couple books at once - right now am reading JUST LIKE THAT by Marsha Qualey, which I think Sarah fans would really like (especially since we have quite a while to wait for the new book). I am also reading WATCH BY MOONLIGHT, a great historical (but very sad) and a legal thriller called THE COLOR OF LAW. All recommended. |
On March 16th, 2006 05:05 am (UTC), (Anonymous) commented: re: gg serena and blair, while not idyllic creatures quite unlike (pehaps) scarlett and halley, haven and ashley,nicole and macy, also serve a joyous purpose in the wonderful world of teenage fiction. maybe less noble than the best of sarah's works but all the same they are enjoyable books and i have grown up (not badly, either) reading these books. i'd take it as a personal affront if the books were "insulted" by some sour middle aged spinster who takes it upon herself to campaign against the books. they deal with a (few) real life issues, and the rest of it is very obviously imagination. let's face it: few of us are able to live the blessed lives of paris hilton but i am sure i am not the only teenage girl that would say she would happily give a life of so called normalacy for one single day as dear old paris. not noble, but certainly understandable coming from your typical middle class female just wanting to shine like blair or serena. perhaps in a kinder way though. |
On March 16th, 2006 05:56 am (UTC), (Anonymous) commented: gg2 upon reading naomi wolf's article (and i didnt have to register BTW) i have slightly changed my perspective. i have only read GG and ive always loved it despite my mothers contempt for it (of course she cannot really talk- can u say mills and boons?) the other books naomi mentioned A-List and Clique sound considerably worse- at least in GG (and jenny's spin off "It Girl") there are values like friendship and Blairs silly romantic notions regarding her virginity. these at least present SOME moral grounding. although i must admit that there is alot of "name dropping" in terms of brands and such. but doesnt that make buying your luxury items even more satisfying (i know it sounds sick and twisted) simply because serena had them too? personally.....i love it. |